There are a variety of different project management styles available. This article discusses three of the most common styles and what you should know about each one. We will also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each style, and how to decide which one is right for your organization. Listed below are some of the differences between the different styles. Once you know which one you should use, you’re ready to make your project a success.
Choosing the right project management style
There are many different project management styles and methodologies, and the right one for your team will depend on your unique needs. When choosing a management style, you should chart out the pros and cons of each, as well as the chances of success. The most promising methodologies, of course, also have the greatest risks. Keep in mind that the sponsor is the person who is ultimately responsible for the project’s outcomes and will represent it to the customer.
Project categorization systems are useful for project managers to compare similar projects to determine what works best for their situation. They allow managers to draw from the lessons learned by others and determine the right level of planning and control for their project. There are some advantages and disadvantages to each type of project management style. Listed below are some of the most popular styles and methodologies. If you want to improve your overall project management skills, try a project categorization system.
Agile project management
The two most common approaches to project management are iterative and waterfall. Both emphasize collaboration and customer involvement during the development process. Agile emphasizes working with customers and stakeholders to identify and address problems as they arise and to iterate until the desired outcome is achieved. The two approaches can be quite different, but they do have similarities. As long as the project manager is clear on his or her goals and the outcome desired, teams can achieve success.
Traditional project management tends to be more suited to troubleshooting and routine maintenance. Agile is a better choice for developing and testing projects. Most IT projects start with a planning and brainstorming phase and then go through multiple testing phases. Some managers will have to adjust an output or feature to make the project more effective. The two styles often go hand-in-hand, depending on the project’s unique needs and goals. A team attempting to integrate both approaches will ultimately be more effective than one that emphasizes a single style.
Scrum project management
The Scrum project management style emphasizes a high-valued focus on customer-centricity. Because of its emphasis on meeting customer needs first, this method can be a good fit for long-term, complex projects. In addition, the project team can prioritize customer feedback, which greatly affects the scope and requirements of the project. In a public spreadsheet, 89 percent of Agile users claim that they trust Scrum. It is also a great fit for projects that cannot be estimated in advance.
The Scrum project management style is derived from the Agile methodology, which stresses open scope and collaboration among team members. The most common examples of Agile management styles include Kanban, Extreme Programming (XP), and Scrum. Some companies have adopted this approach, including Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, and Adobe. The Scrum method is a proven tool for agile software development and has gained widespread acceptance. And it’s not just software companies that use it – large corporations like General Electric, Yahoo, and Google have adopted it as their own.
Kanban project management
A popular management style that encourages continuous work toward a goal, Kanban was developed by Toyota in the 1940s. Today, this project management style has spread to almost every factory floor in the world, as well as to emerging industries. This method encourages continuous work on a project, beginning with a simple scrap of metal. From that point, the piece of metal would be transformed into a car. Then, another piece would be added, and so on.
The key to successful project management using the Kanban-style is identifying the right team members. A cohesive team will benefit most from this approach. Employees will not feel the need for micromanagement and will be more likely to contribute to the project. The project management style also relies on the visualization of workflows, so everyone knows what they need to do and when. This style also enables early identification of issues, such as inefficiencies and bottlenecks. Another useful style to consider is PRINCE2, or Projects IN Controlled Environments. It helps organizations plan and manage projects effectively, and is applicable to any industry.
Lean project management
The core principles of Lean project management are standardization and improvement. Because most projects are novel in some way, reducing the number of variations in tasks will improve the performance of projects in the short and long term. Standardization also enables teams to improve efficiencies in similar tasks across the project lifecycle. Improvement occurs incrementally throughout the project lifecycle, leading to gradual progress towards the goals of the project. It is also important to recognize the benefits of embracing variation.
Another characteristic of lean project management is the use of tools that can help the team track progress. Kanban timesheets and Hive resourcing are two examples of useful tools that help teams keep track of how much time they spend on their projects. They can help them avoid burnout by identifying key tasks and resourcing accordingly. Hive Analytics can be used to monitor the efficiency of the teams’ activities on a macro level.
Six Sigma project management
Six Sigma project management styles vary by company, but these principles can help companies improve their project management and increase customer value. This methodology comes from manufacturing, and it was used by GE to achieve $8 billion in savings. Its scientific approach can help companies find areas of improvement and measure their successes. This can be very confusing and time-consuming, but it is well worth the effort to improve your company’s processes. If you’re interested in Six Sigma, learn more about the different styles below.
Each style stresses concrete steps and a systematic approach to problem-solving. Using Six Sigma, project managers should be meticulous about scope, cost, and schedule. Each of these three parameters is interconnected. If one is not rigorous, the other will be, too. The DMAIC style emphasizes a methodical approach, and Six Sigma emphasizes a structured approach with well-defined steps. These steps can help project managers ensure that projects are successful while remaining within budget and quality standards.
PRINCE2 project management
The PRINCE2 project management style emphasizes a highly structured project management process. This style breaks down work into stages and sub-processes, dictates control of work packages, and sets up regular quality review sessions. It also puts emphasis on a clear incentive for the project team, as well as a commitment to continuous learning and incorporating lessons learned into subsequent projects. It is highly effective in fostering teamwork and increasing collaboration.
The PRINCE2 project management style divides the project into separate stages, each with its own objectives. The project board approves each stage before moving on to the next. The project manager reviews each stage and records any lessons learned, while the rest of the team works on the next stage. The PM will also maintain a log of the project’s progress and keep track of any loose ends. This style does not call for constant micromanagement, which helps a project manager develop a relationship with his or her team.
The PRINCE2 project management style identifies roles and responsibilities. The phases of the project are defined and managed, with each stage requiring an updated business case and risk analysis. At each stage, the project manager will assess the needs of the client, and make adjustments to the project as necessary. There is also a project board and project team, and each of these roles should be tailored to the project environment. The first activity to initiate a project is tailoring. This involves defining the scope of the project, identifying the needs of the client, and determining the resources needed for the project.
Waterfall project management
A Waterfall project management style is based on the idea that all project requirements can be fully understood upfront. The project manager must first identify the needs and requirements of the project sponsor and then create a written requirement document. These requirements describe the project’s various stages, the costs involved, the risks and dependencies, success metrics, and the timeframes for completion. However, one important aspect of Waterfall project management is the fact that it is rigid. If there is a change in the project’s requirements, this style of management may not work.
Traditional project management software applications typically support waterfall project management. These tools are file-based, storing data for different projects in isolated files that are accessible only to project managers. Those tools are largely ineffective for distributed teams and heterogeneous environments. The limitations of the waterfall project management style make them an inferior choice. Therefore, project managers should understand which styles work best for their projects before choosing a management style. The following are some key considerations when evaluating project management styles.