How Text-Only Posts Can Help Your Blog: Clarity, Speed, Accessibility, and Search Visibility

Essential Concepts

• Text-only posts can improve clarity because words, headings, and structure carry the full meaning without competing visuals.
• Text-only posts can publish faster because they remove image creation, editing, sourcing, and formatting steps.
• Text-only posts can load faster because they reduce page weight, network requests, and layout shifts tied to media.
• Text-only posts can support accessibility because readable text works well with screen readers, resizing, and alternative formats, while non-text content often needs extra text support to be equally usable. (W3C)
• Text-only posts can help search visibility when they answer a specific query plainly, use descriptive headings, and avoid thin or repetitive wording. (Google for Developers)
• Text-only posts still need strong structure, original thinking, and a good on-page experience; they are not automatically “better” than mixed-media posts. (Google for Developers)
• Text-only does not mean “unstyled”; typography, spacing, and heading hierarchy still shape whether the post is easy to read and navigate. (W3C)
• When a topic depends on visual evidence or interpretation, a text-only approach can be limiting unless the writing can fully carry the needed detail.

Background or Introduction

Text-only posts are blog posts that rely primarily on words: headings, paragraphs, and simple formatting. They may include links and basic on-page elements, but they do not depend on images, embedded media, or visual design features to make the content understandable.

For bloggers, this format matters because it reduces production friction while pushing writing quality to the surface. A text-only post succeeds or fails on how well it defines terms, answers a real question, and guides a reader through ideas without distractions. It can also reduce technical issues tied to page load, page stability, and content accessibility, which can affect both user experience and how search systems interpret the page. (Google for Developers)

This article explains how text-only posts can help your blog, when they can hurt, and how to write them so they serve readers first while still aligning with how search works. (Google for Developers)

What counts as a text-only post for a blog?

A text-only post is a page where the primary information is delivered through written language and structural markup. In practice, it means the post does not require images, charts, or embedded media to understand the core message.

What “text-only” does and does not mean

Text-only does mean:

• The argument, instructions, or explanation is complete without visual support.
• The page uses headings to signal topic shifts and subtopics.
• The post can be skimmed through its structure and still remain coherent.

Text-only does not automatically mean:

• No links.
• No lists.
• No emphasis formatting.
• No structured data markup behind the scenes.

The point is functional dependence. If the reader needs a visual element to understand the claim, the post is not truly text-only, even if it contains a lot of text.

Why the definition matters for results

This distinction matters because the benefits people attribute to text-only posts usually come from removing media-related complexity. If the page still uses heavy scripts, unstable layouts, or cluttered design, it may not gain the speed and stability advantages often associated with text-first publishing. (Google for Developers)

How can text-only posts help your blog in the simplest terms?

Text-only posts help your blog by concentrating your effort where it usually pays off: answering a real question clearly, publishing consistently, and reducing avoidable technical baggage.

They reduce production bottlenecks

Removing image workflows removes multiple steps: sourcing, rights checks, editing, sizing, compression, captions, placement, and responsive behavior testing. Even when each step is quick, the combined friction adds up, especially when you publish frequently.

A simpler pipeline can make it easier to maintain a steady publishing rhythm. Consistency is not a guarantee of growth, but it is often a prerequisite for learning what your audience actually uses and needs.

They make clarity non-negotiable

When you cannot lean on visuals, vague writing becomes obvious. Text-only publishing can push you toward stronger definitions, tighter structure, and clearer claims. That shift helps readers, and it also tends to reduce pogo-sticking behaviors where someone clicks in and quickly leaves because the page does not answer the query.

They can improve page experience by default, but not automatically

A page with fewer media elements often has fewer requests, less layout movement, and fewer rendering delays. Those improvements can support page experience metrics that are commonly discussed in search documentation, including measures tied to loading, interactivity, and layout stability. (Google for Developers)

But “text-only” is not the same as “lightweight.” A text page can still be slow if the site theme, scripts, fonts, and third-party elements are heavy.

How do text-only posts support search visibility?

Text-only posts can support search visibility when they align tightly with a specific query, communicate meaning through headings and language, and avoid thin content patterns. (Google for Developers)

Search systems primarily read text to understand topic and intent

Modern search systems use many signals, but written text remains a primary way a page communicates what it is about. A page that states its purpose plainly, defines its scope, and stays on-topic reduces ambiguity.

That does not mean keyword repetition. It means semantic consistency: the words you use should match the questions readers ask and the answers they expect, without drifting into adjacent topics that dilute relevance.

Headings and labels do real work for comprehension and navigation

Descriptive headings are not decoration. They help readers orient themselves and help assistive technology navigate. They also signal structure to systems that parse documents. Accessibility guidance emphasizes that headings should describe topic or purpose. (W3C)

A text-only post usually relies on headings more than a media-heavy post. That reliance becomes an advantage when headings are genuinely informative.

Text-only posts can reduce “thinness” risk when depth is real

Thin content is not just a low word count. It is content that provides little added value, repeats what is already common, or fails to satisfy the intent behind the query. A text-only post can drift into thinness if it is generic, padded, or circular.

The remedy is not length for its own sake. The remedy is substance: precise definitions, clear boundaries, and information that earns its space. Search documentation that focuses on helpful, people-first content is consistent on this point: content should exist to benefit readers, not to manipulate rankings. (Google for Developers)

Text-only posts are well-suited to answer-focused formats

If your post’s value is an explanation, a framework, a decision guide, or a set of cautions, text can be the most direct delivery method. Answer-focused writing tends to perform better when it is explicit early and then supports the claim with detail.

This matters because many search interactions are fast. People want confirmation in the first few seconds that the page matches their question. Text-only posts can meet that need with a direct opening and a well-labeled structure.

Structured data can still apply, even to text-only content

Structured data is a way to label certain page elements in a format that machines can interpret more reliably. It does not require images. Its usefulness depends on the content type and your site’s implementation, and eligibility for enhanced search appearance depends on multiple factors. (Google for Developers)

If you use structured data, the writing still has to stand on its own. Markup is a signal layer, not a substitute for clarity.

Can text-only posts improve readability and keep readers on the page?

Yes, text-only posts can improve readability when they use plain language, thoughtful pacing, and predictable structure. But they can also become harder to read if the text is dense, abstract, or poorly formatted.

Readability starts with cognitive load, not reading level scores

Readability tools can be useful, but they are blunt instruments. What matters more is cognitive load: how much mental effort a reader must spend to parse sentences, track the argument, and understand the terms.

To reduce cognitive load in text-only posts:

• Use short-to-medium paragraphs, with occasional single-sentence paragraphs for emphasis or transitions.
• Put the core answer early, then expand with reasons and conditions.
• Define technical terms the first time they appear.
• Avoid stacked abstractions where one unclear concept is used to explain another.

Accessibility guidance also recognizes that when text becomes complex, providing a more easily understood version or a summary can help more people understand the content. (W3C)

Good text-only posts are skimmable without being shallow

Skimmability is not about reducing depth. It is about making depth navigable.

Skimmability usually depends on:

• Clear section headings that match real questions.
• Short lead sentences that answer the heading directly.
• Lists used to clarify options, criteria, or steps.
• Occasional recap sentences at the end of a section.

When a reader can skim and still find the exact part they need, the page becomes more useful, even if the reader does not consume every word.

Sentence structure matters more when there are no visuals

Images can provide pauses. Without them, sentence-level rhythm carries more weight.

Practical sentence-level habits for text-only posts:

• Prefer concrete verbs over noun-heavy phrases.
• Reduce prepositional chains.
• Keep the subject and verb close together.
• Use transitions that show whether you are adding, contrasting, or narrowing scope.

This is not about sounding “simple.” It is about being usable.

How do text-only posts help accessibility?

Text-only posts can help accessibility because text is the most flexible form of web content. It can be resized, reflowed, read aloud, translated, and navigated with assistive technology.

Accessibility guidance is explicit that non-text content needs text alternatives so it can be converted into forms people need. (W3C)

Text is adaptable across devices and needs

Text adapts to:

• Larger font sizes without losing meaning.
• Different screen sizes without requiring horizontal scrolling.
• Screen readers that convert text to speech.
• Reader modes that simplify layout.

When a post is truly text-only, fewer elements require special handling to remain usable.

Headings improve navigation for assistive technology

Headings are more than styling. When headings are used correctly, assistive technology can navigate by structure. Accessibility guidance stresses descriptive headings and labels that describe topic or purpose. (W3C)

This is a core reason text-only posts can be accessible by design, but only if the writer respects heading hierarchy and meaning.

Plain language supports more readers than many bloggers assume

Plain language is not a style preference. It is an accessibility strategy. When text becomes complex, guidance recognizes the benefit of offering a simpler version or summary for broader comprehension. (W3C)

A subtle, graduate-level tone can still be plain. The key is avoiding unnecessary complexity:

• Prefer familiar words when they carry the same meaning.
• Use technical terms only when they are necessary, then define them.
• Avoid idioms that do not translate well across contexts.

Text-only posts reduce reliance on alt text quality

Alt text is important when images are used, but it is also easy to do poorly. When a post does not rely on images, you reduce the risk that missing or weak text alternatives will block understanding.

That does not mean images are “bad.” It means text-only can be a dependable baseline for accessibility.

Can text-only posts make your site faster?

They can, but the outcome depends on what else loads on the page. A text-only post often reduces page weight because it removes image files, video players, and extra scripts tied to media.

Search-facing documentation discusses page experience measures that focus on loading, interactivity, and layout stability, commonly described through metrics like LCP, INP, and CLS. (Google for Developers)

Why speed gains happen

Text-only posts often:

• Reduce total bytes downloaded.
• Reduce the number of network requests.
• Reduce layout movement caused by late-loading media.
• Reduce the chance that the largest element on the page is a heavy media asset.

These changes can make the page feel quicker and more stable.

The important caveat: theme and scripts can erase the advantage

A text page can still load slowly if it includes:

• Heavy third-party scripts.
• Excessive font loading.
• Large client-side frameworks used for small tasks.
• Pop-ups and overlays that delay interactivity.

So the real benefit is not “text-only” in isolation. It is “text-first plus restrained page design.”

Layout stability matters for reading

Layout shifts are especially disruptive in text-heavy pages because they can move the line a reader is focusing on. Reducing media can reduce that problem, but only if spacing is reserved and layout rules are stable across devices. (Google for Developers)

Do text-only posts help with trust?

They can, because they can be more transparent. When the writing is the product, readers can evaluate it quickly. They can see whether claims are specific, whether terms are defined, and whether the writer respects limits and uncertainty.

Trust grows when claims are bounded

A trustworthy text-only post:

• Distinguishes between what is generally true and what varies by context.
• Names the variable when outcomes can differ.
• Avoids universal statements unless they are truly universal.

This is especially important for advice posts, where readers often misapply guidance that was meant for a narrower situation.

Trust grows when the page feels calm and usable

A text-only page can feel calmer because it reduces stimulation and competing signals. Calm does not mean boring. It means the page does not fight the reader.

Calm usability often comes from:

• Predictable heading structure.
• Moderate paragraph length.
• Adequate spacing.
• Minimal interruptions.

Those choices also align with accessibility and page experience goals. (W3C)

When do text-only posts not help?

Text-only posts do not help when the subject requires visual interpretation or when the value depends on showing rather than telling.

A text-only approach can also fail when it becomes a shortcut for low effort. Removing images does not excuse weak structure, vague claims, or recycled phrasing.

Topics that may be constrained by text-only delivery

Text-only can be limiting when:

• The reader needs to compare visual details.
• The content depends on spatial relationships that are difficult to describe.
• The reader needs to verify evidence that is primarily visual.

In these cases, a text-only post can still exist, but it must be honest about what it can and cannot deliver.

The risk of monotony

A long text-only post can become monotonous if it lacks internal variation. Variation does not require anecdotes or visuals. It requires:

• Clear sectioning.
• Brief recaps.
• Occasional lists used for decision points.
• Shifts between definition, explanation, and application.

How should you structure a text-only post so it performs well?

A text-only post performs best when it answers the main question early, then uses a predictable structure that lets readers jump to what they need.

Start with a direct answer, then widen the lens

A strong structure often follows this progression:

1. A short answer in the first paragraph.
2. A definition of key terms.
3. The main reasons or benefits.
4. Limits and caveats.
5. Practical guidance and checkpoints.

This structure matches “know simple” and “know” intent in one piece: fast clarity first, depth afterward.

Use headings that mirror real queries

Headings should sound like questions a blogger would type. This has two benefits:

• Readers can self-select the sections they need.
• The page becomes easier to parse for systems that interpret structure.

Accessibility guidance supports descriptive headings and labels that describe topic or purpose. (W3C)

Use a logical heading hierarchy

A common failure in text-heavy posts is using headings as styling rather than structure. A clean hierarchy helps both comprehension and navigation.

Practical hierarchy rules:

• One primary page title.
• Top-level sections that represent distinct subtopics.
• Subsections only when they narrow the scope meaningfully.
• Headings that are specific enough to stand alone.

Make the first 1 to 3 sentences do the work

For every section, aim for a lead that:

• Answers the heading directly.
• States the main point plainly.
• Signals the scope of what follows.

This is one of the simplest ways to keep long-form writing readable and useful.

How do you keep text-only posts engaging without visuals?

Engagement in text-only posts comes from precision, momentum, and reader orientation. It is less about entertainment and more about steady usefulness.

Use specificity instead of intensity

When writers lack visuals, they sometimes compensate with exaggerated language. That usually reduces trust. Specificity is better:

• Name the mechanism, not just the outcome.
• State the condition, not just the claim.
• Explain the trade-off, not just the benefit.

Use micro-summaries to keep orientation

Micro-summaries are short recap sentences placed at natural breaks. They help readers who are skimming, distracted, or returning later.

They work best when they:

• Restate the point in simpler words.
• Clarify what the reader should do with the information.
• Avoid introducing new ideas.

This approach also aligns with accessibility guidance that recognizes the value of simplified versions or summaries when text becomes complex. (W3C)

Use lists only when they reduce confusion

Lists are useful when a reader must compare options, follow a sequence, or check criteria. They are not useful when used as filler.

Good list use in text-only posts:

• Criteria lists for decisions.
• Step lists for processes.
• Risk lists for common failure points.
• Checklist lists for publishing.

Avoid lists that restate paragraphs without adding structure.

Control paragraph density

Dense paragraphs can be appropriate for nuanced reasoning, but too many in a row creates fatigue. Variation is a reading aid.

A practical rule: if a paragraph contains multiple ideas, split it. A single paragraph should usually accomplish one main job.

How can text-only posts improve topical focus and reduce content drift?

Text-only posts can sharpen topical focus because they force you to decide what the page is truly about. Without visuals, you cannot hide drift behind presentation.

Use scope statements early

A scope statement is a sentence that tells the reader what the post will and will not cover. This is not a table of contents. It is a boundary.

A good scope statement:

• Names the main question.
• Names the intended audience.
• Names the constraints.

This reduces reader frustration and reduces the temptation to inflate the post with loosely related material.

Use definitions to anchor meaning

Many blog posts fail because they rely on fuzzy terms. In text-only writing, definitions are anchors.

Define:

• What the key term means in this post.
• What it does not mean.
• What related terms you will treat as distinct.

This helps readers and reduces internal contradictions.

Use section-level relevance checks

Before finalizing a section, ask:

• Does this section answer the page’s core question?
• Does it introduce a new sub-question that belongs here?
• Does it repeat a point already made?

If the answer is mostly “no,” cut or move the section.

How do text-only posts fit a people-first content approach?

Text-only posts can align well with people-first content because they make usefulness obvious. They either help the reader or they do not. Official search documentation that emphasizes helpful, reliable, people-first content frames the goal similarly: content should benefit people rather than exist primarily to influence rankings. (Google for Developers)

People-first does not mean informal

People-first means:

• The content is written to solve a real reader problem.
• The page is honest about limits and uncertainty.
• The structure supports use, not just publishing.

A formal tone can still be people-first if the writing remains clear and the claims remain grounded.

Avoid search-first writing patterns

Search-first patterns tend to look like:

• Repetitive phrases that add no meaning.
• Overextended introductions that delay the answer.
• Sections added only to increase length.
• Empty “tips” that are obvious and unsupported.

The antidote is focus and substance. If every paragraph must earn its place, the post stays useful.

Originality is not novelty

Originality in blogging often means:

• Clear synthesis of known information.
• Thoughtful constraints and definitions.
• Well-structured guidance that respects the reader’s time.

You do not need shock value. You need a clean answer.

Can text-only posts help with answer visibility and summary-style search features?

They can, because answer-focused writing is easier to extract and summarize. Systems that generate summaries or highlight direct answers tend to prefer content that is explicit and structured.

Write answer lines that stand alone

An answer line is a sentence that can be quoted without losing meaning. This is not about chasing extraction. It is about clarity.

Answer lines often:

• Use concrete nouns.
• Avoid pronouns that require previous context.
• Avoid hedging that makes the sentence meaningless.

Use definition formatting where appropriate

When a post defines key terms, the definition should be:

• Close to the first use.
• Written in plain language.
• Followed by one or two implications that show how the definition matters.

This helps readers and improves internal consistency.

Use small tables only when comparison is otherwise confusing

Text-only posts can include small tables when they reduce confusion. Here is a practical table that often helps bloggers decide whether text-only fits a given post.

Decision factor	Text-only works best when	Text-only is riskier when
Core value	The value is explanation and guidance	The value depends on visual interpretation
Reader goal	The reader wants a direct answer and reasoning	The reader must verify visual details
Production reality	Publishing speed and consistency matter	The post must show visual evidence to be trustworthy

This table avoids pretending the format is universally better. It is a tool for fit.

How do you avoid “thin content” in text-only posts?

You avoid thin content by making the post specific, complete, and honest about what it covers. Thinness is a usefulness problem, not just a length problem. (Google for Developers)

Use a completeness test

A text-only post is more likely to feel complete when it answers:

• What it is.
• Why it matters.
• How it works.
• When it fails.
• What to do next.

If you cannot answer these for the topic, the post may be too broad, too vague, or not ready.

Replace vague advice with criteria

Vague advice sounds like guidance but leaves the reader with no decision rule. Criteria give the reader something to apply.

Criteria usually look like:

• If the goal is X, prioritize Y.
• If the constraint is Z, avoid W.
• If the reader’s situation includes A, the guidance changes.

This is still general, but it is usable.

Make peace with removing sections

Long-form writing often improves when you cut. In text-only posts, cutting is especially important because filler is more visible.

A practical editing habit:

• Remove any sentence that repeats the previous sentence in different words.
• Replace any abstract noun phrase with a concrete action where possible.
• Cut any section that exists only to introduce the next section.

How should you handle links and citations in text-only posts?

Links can strengthen a text-only post by giving the reader paths to verify or deepen understanding. But too many links can also distract.

Use links to support claims, not to perform authority

A text-only post should not rely on links to look credible. Links should serve the reader:

• Definitions from primary standards.
• Official documentation for widely used metrics or technical concepts.
• Reference material that clarifies a term that is easy to misunderstand.

When you link, anchor the link with words that describe what the reader will get, not vague phrases.

Keep the page readable when links are present

To keep readability:

• Avoid clustering many links in one paragraph.
• Keep link text descriptive.
• Do not interrupt a key sentence with multiple link interruptions.

If the post reads like a citation list, it stops functioning as a blog post.

How do you optimize text-only posts for a good on-page experience?

Text-only posts live or die on typography and layout. You do not need visuals, but you do need readable presentation.

Line length and spacing shape comprehension

Very wide lines make it harder to track. Many typography references recommend a moderate character count per line for comfortable reading, often discussed in ranges around 50 to 75 characters, with variation depending on font and device. (UXPin)

You do not need to obsess over the exact number. The practical goal is to avoid lines so wide that readers lose their place, especially on large screens.

Use generous whitespace around headings

Whitespace is a navigation aid. It signals section breaks and reduces visual fatigue.

A common problem in long posts is compressing headings so tightly that sections blur together. If your theme allows, spacing is one of the simplest readability improvements.

Use consistent emphasis patterns

Overuse of bold or italics makes emphasis meaningless. In text-only posts, too much emphasis also creates visual noise.

Use emphasis to:

• Highlight definitions.
• Mark key constraints.
• Surface the conclusion of a section.

Avoid emphasis as decoration.

Ensure headings work out of context

A quick test: read only the headings in order. If the outline is coherent, the post is likely navigable. This is aligned with accessibility guidance on descriptive headings and labels. (W3C)

How often should you publish text-only posts?

The right frequency depends on your capacity, your editorial goals, and how complex your topics are. There is no universal schedule that guarantees results.

Use text-only posts to stabilize your publishing system

If your current workflow breaks because media production is too heavy, text-only posts can stabilize your system. They can become a default format for topics where words carry the full value.

Balance format with reader expectations

Some audiences expect visuals. Others prefer fast, readable explanations. Your own data will tell you more than general advice.

If you measure, measure carefully:

• Look at search impressions and clicks, not just pageviews.
• Watch whether the page satisfies the query, shown by lower short clicks and higher scroll depth, when your analytics can track it.
• Treat changes as directional, not absolute, because measurement varies by setup and traffic mix.

How do you refresh or update text-only posts?

Text-only posts are often easier to update because there are fewer assets to rebuild. Updates can improve usefulness when the topic changes or when your earlier wording is no longer precise.

Update for accuracy, not just freshness

Update when:

• A definition has changed in common usage.
• A recommendation depends on tools or systems that have changed.
• Reader questions show confusion that your post did not anticipate.

Avoid changing dates or headings just to look current. That can confuse returning readers and undermine trust.

Use a revision pattern that protects clarity

A practical pattern:

1. Re-check the opening answer to ensure it still matches the best current understanding.
2. Scan headings for relevance and redundancy.
3. Tighten definitions.
4. Add caveats where readers commonly misapply advice.
5. Remove outdated claims rather than stacking new claims on top.

This keeps the post coherent instead of becoming a patchwork.

What writing habits make text-only posts stronger over time?

Text-only publishing rewards disciplined habits more than cleverness.

Write with “purpose per paragraph”

Each paragraph should have a purpose:

• Define.
• Explain.
• Qualify.
• Transition.
• Conclude.

When paragraphs try to do multiple jobs, they become vague.

Use constraint language to stay honest

Constraint language includes phrases that bound a claim:

• “This depends on…”
• “This tends to work when…”
• “This is less reliable when…”

This is not hedging. It is accuracy.

Build a reusable editing checklist

A checklist keeps text-only writing from becoming repetitive or bloated.

Core checklist items:

• Does the opening answer the title directly?
• Are key terms defined at first use?
• Do headings match real questions?
• Does each section answer its heading in the first 1 to 3 sentences?
• Are there any paragraphs that repeat earlier points?
• Are there any claims that should be softened because outcomes vary?

This is simple, but it prevents the most common failures.

How do you decide whether to write a text-only post or a mixed-media post?

Choose the format based on the reader’s need, not on what is easiest.

Decision questions that usually work

Ask:

• Can a reader fully understand the topic through words alone?
• Will removing visuals increase or decrease comprehension?
• Is the main value an explanation, or is it visual interpretation?
• Is speed of publishing a genuine constraint right now?

If words alone can do the job, text-only is often a strong choice.

The most common misstep: using text-only as a shortcut

Text-only is not a shortcut to quality. It is a higher standard for writing. If the post is generic, the lack of visuals will not hide that.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are text-only posts good for SEO?

They can be, but only when the content is genuinely helpful, focused, and well-structured. Search documentation emphasizes people-first usefulness and a good page experience, which text-only posts can support when executed well. (Google for Developers)

Do text-only posts rank better than posts with images?

No format ranks “better” by default. Rankings depend on relevance, usefulness, and many site-level factors. Text-only posts can reduce media-related problems and improve clarity, but they can also underperform if the topic requires visuals.

Will text-only posts reduce my bounce rate?

They can, but bounce rate is a blunt metric and depends on your analytics setup and user intent. A better goal is query satisfaction: the reader finds the answer quickly and does not need to return to the results.

Are text-only posts more accessible?

Often, yes, because text is adaptable and works well with assistive technology. Accessibility guidance emphasizes providing text alternatives for non-text content, which becomes less of a dependency when the content is already text-first. (W3C)

Does “text-only” mean I should avoid lists?

No. Lists are part of text and can improve clarity when they reduce confusion or support decisions. The key is to use lists for structure, not decoration.

Can a text-only post still use structured data?

Yes. Structured data is a behind-the-scenes way to describe page elements in a standardized format, and it does not require images. Eligibility for enhanced search appearance depends on the content type and implementation details. (Google for Developers)

Are long text-only posts always better than short ones?

No. Length does not equal usefulness. A long post is better only when the added length provides real value through clearer definitions, deeper reasoning, and practical constraints.

How do I keep a long text-only post from feeling overwhelming?

Use descriptive headings, answer each heading immediately, keep paragraphs moderate, and use micro-summaries at natural breaks. When text becomes complex, providing simplified phrasing or summaries can support comprehension. (W3C)

Do text-only posts help with page speed metrics?

They can, because fewer media elements often means fewer bytes and fewer layout shifts. But outcomes depend on your theme, scripts, fonts, and third-party elements, not just on whether the post includes images. Metrics tied to loading, interactivity, and layout stability are commonly referenced in search-facing guidance. (Google for Developers)

What is the biggest mistake bloggers make with text-only posts?

Treating text-only as permission to publish vague, padded content. Text-only posts succeed when they are specific, structured, and honest about limits, not when they simply avoid images.

Should every blog have some text-only posts?

Not necessarily. But most blogs can benefit from having at least some posts where words carry the full value, especially for explanation-heavy topics. The decision should be based on reader needs and your ability to maintain quality.